Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Surg Res ; 284: 264-268, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2122648

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Given the early surge of COVID-19 in New Jersey (NJ), a statewide executive order (EO) to stay-at-home was instituted on March 22, 2020. We hypothesized that the EO would result in a decreased number of trauma admissions, length of stay, and resources utilized in trauma patients at NJ trauma centers. METHODS: In an institutional review board-approved, retrospective, multicenter study, trauma registries at three level one trauma centers in NJ were queried from March 22 to June 14 in 2020 and compared to the same timeframe the year prior. Epidemiological and clinical data were obtained including demographics, select preexisting conditions, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, resources utilized, and outcomes. RESULTS: 1859 trauma patients were evaluated during the EO versus 2201 the year prior. During the EO, trauma patients were less likely to be transferred from another hospital (21% versus 29% P < 0.05), more likely to have a penetrating mechanism (16% versus 12% P < 0.05), were equally likely to require a procedure (P = 0.44) and had similar injury severity score (5 [interquartile range [IQR] 1-9] versus 5 [IQR 1-9], P = 0.73). There was no significant difference in ventilator days (0 [IQR 0-1] versus 0 [IQR 0-2] P = 0.08), intensive care unit days (2 [IQR 0-4] versus 2 [IQR 0-3] P = 0.99), or length of stay (2 [IQR 1-5] versus 2 [IQR 1-6] P = 0.73). Patients were more likely to be sent home than to rehabilitation or long-term acute care hospital during the EO (81% versus 78%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The 2020 COVID-19 EO was associated with a significantly different epidemiology with a higher rate of penetrating injury during the EO, and similar volume of injured patients evaluated.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Retrospective Studies , New Jersey/epidemiology , Incidence , COVID-19/epidemiology , Injury Severity Score , Trauma Centers , Length of Stay
2.
Am Surg ; 88(9): 2255-2257, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1886831

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) typically manifests with respiratory symptoms and can ultimately progress to severe multiorgan failure. Viral myositis, systemic capillary leak syndrome, and arteriovenous thrombosis are atypical manifestations of COVID-19. We present a case of a 33-year-old woman, fully vaccinated against COVID-19, who developed myositis and shock. She ultimately required bilateral lower extremity fasciotomies secondary to compartment syndrome, presumably from COVID-19 myositis. Although compartment syndrome from COVID-19 myositis has been reported for ocular, hand, and thigh compartment syndromes, this is the first case report showing bilateral lower extremity compartment syndrome secondary to COVID-19 myositis in a fully vaccinated individual. As we learn more about COVID-19 and its extrapulmonary effects, it is imperative to consider all working diagnoses when working up patients. Providers must be aware of extrapulmonary effects of COVID-19, particularly in individuals who might deviate from traditional symptoms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Compartment Syndromes , Myositis , Adult , COVID-19/complications , Compartment Syndromes/etiology , Fasciotomy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Myositis/complications , Thigh
3.
JAAPA ; 34(11): 31-33, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1596763

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Since its discovery, COVID-19 has infected nearly 112 million people and caused about 2.5 millions deaths worldwide. Our understanding of the clinical presentation and complications of COVID-19 is still evolving. Bilateral pulmonary ground-glass opacities on imaging have become characteristic in the diagnosis of COVID-19, but pneumomediastinum has now also been reported in some patients with COVID-19. Reports on the overall prognosis for these patients are conflicting and little information exists regarding long-term complications. This article describes the clinical course of a patient who did not need mechanical ventilation but developed spontaneous pneumomediastinum.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Humans , Mediastinal Emphysema/chemically induced , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Prognosis , Respiration, Artificial , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 5(1): e000557, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1318215

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reported characteristics and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are widely disparate with varying mortality rates. No literature describes outcomes in ICU patients with COVID-19 managed by an acute care surgery (ACS) division. Our ACS division manages all ICU patients at a community hospital in New Jersey. When that hospital was overwhelmed and in crisis secondary to COVID-19, we sought to describe outcomes for all patients with COVID-19 admitted to our closed ICU managed by the ACS division. METHODS: This was a prospective case series of the first 120 consecutive patients with COVID-19 admitted on March 14 to May 10, 2020. Final follow-up was May 27, 2020. Patients discharged from the ICU or who died were included. Patients still admitted to the ICU at final follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were included (median age 64 years (range 25-89), 66.7% men). The most common comorbidities were hypertension (75; 62.5%), obesity (61; 50.8%), and diabetes (50; 41.7%). One hundred and thirteen (94%) developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, 89 (74.2%) had shock, and 76 (63.3%) experienced acute kidney injury. One hundred (83.3%) required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Median ICU length of stay (LOS) was 8.5 days (IQR 9), hospital LOS was 14.5 days (IQR 13). Mortality for all ICU patients with COVID-19 was 53.3% and 62% for IMV patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of patients with COVID-19 admitted to a community hospital ICU managed by an ACS division who also provided all surge care. Mortality of critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to an overwhelmed hospital in crisis may not be as high as initially thought based on prior reports. While COVID-19 is a non-surgical disease, ACS divisions have the capability of successfully caring for both surgical and medical critically ill patients, thus providing versatility in times of crisis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

5.
J Intensive Care Med ; 36(4): 484-493, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-977608

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: While fever may be a presenting symptom of COVID-19, fever at hospital admission has not been identified as a predictor of mortality. However, hyperthermia during critical illness among ventilated COVID-19 patients in the ICU has not yet been studied. We sought to determine mortality predictors among ventilated COVID-19 ICU patients and we hypothesized that fever in the ICU is predictive of mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 103 ventilated COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU between March 14 and May 27, 2020. Final follow-up was June 5, 2020. Patients discharged from the ICU or who died were included. Patients still admitted to the ICU at final follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: 103 patients were included, 40 survived and 63(61.1%) died. Deceased patients were older {66 years[IQR18] vs 62.5[IQR10], (p = 0.0237)}, more often male {48(68%) vs 22(55%), (p = 0.0247)}, had lower initial oxygen saturation {86.0%[IQR18] vs 91.5%[IQR11.5], (p = 0.0060)}, and had lower pH nadir than survivors {7.10[IQR0.2] vs 7.30[IQR0.2] (p < 0.0001)}. Patients had higher peak temperatures during ICU stay as compared to hospital presentation {103.3°F[IQR1.7] vs 100.0°F[IQR3.5], (p < 0.0001)}. Deceased patients had higher peak ICU temperatures than survivors {103.6°F[IQR2.0] vs 102.9°F[IQR1.4], (p = 0.0008)}. Increasing peak temperatures were linearly associated with mortality. Febrile patients who underwent targeted temperature management to achieve normothermia did not have different outcomes than those not actively cooled. Multivariable analysis revealed 60% and 75% higher risk of mortality with peak temperature greater than 103°F and 104°F respectively; it also confirmed hyperthermia, age, male sex, and acidosis to be predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first studies to identify ICU hyperthermia as predictive of mortality in ventilated COVID-19 patients. Additional predictors included male sex, age, and acidosis. With COVID-19 cases increasing, identification of ICU mortality predictors is crucial to improve risk stratification, resource management, and patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Fever/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Respiration, Artificial/mortality , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/therapy , Critical Care Outcomes , Female , Fever/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL